FOX: 01244 660611 eMail: ¡[email protected]
EDITOR Neil D alley water eMail: [email protected] Telephone: O'iii 663too ext. 212
EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Alex Ou est eMail: al [email protected] Telephone: 01244 663400 ext. 299
ART EDITOR GaiEva (H
eMcr;/; [email protected] pu bi is hi ng.co. uk Telephone: ÜU44 663400 ext. 204
PRODUCTION MANAGER Justine Hart eMail p rod [email protected] deefi.co.uk _telephone: 01244 663400 ext. 235_
ACCOUNTS ft ADMIN MANAGER Emma McCrindte eMail dcccuv.s;i|czzpjb ts"ilnQC0.u< _Telephone: 01244 663400 ext. 207_
ADMINISTRATION Jan Sdiofield eMail: [email protected] Telephone: 01244 663400 ext. 219 Katie-Maiie Chailinor eMar/: kat ie$j azzpu blish i ng.co. uk Telephone 01214 663400 «1.220
CREDIT CONTROL Pom Coleman eMail: paiTKiiijazzpublishing.co.uk Telephone: 01244 663400 ext. 215
ADVERTISING S EVENTS MANAGES Shelley Curry eMail: [email protected] Telephone: 01244 663400 ext. 303
ADVERTISING ENQUtRICS Dee Skinner eMail: advertisingi^skirideep.co.uk Telephone: 0124<i 663400 ext. 301
EVENTS CO ORDINATOR Wendy Marl»
eMail: weridy. ma r ks @]a zzpuhi rshi ng. co.u k Telephone: 01244 663400 ext. 305
CIRCULATION 6 PROMOTIONS Katy Cuffin eMail: [email protected] _Telephone: 01244 663400 Ext. 237_
SUBSCRIPTIONS h BACK ISSUES
eMcr;/; ma ga nes(c£j azz pu b lis hing .Co. uk Telephone: 01778 392086
PUBLISHER David Gamble eMail: [email protected] Telephone: 01244 663400
MANAGING DIRECTOR Stuart Mears eMa;/:[email protected] _Telephone 01244 663400_
CONTRIBUTORS iihley, Gavin rindrigues, Gareth Fufce, Daniel Pis ion des, Irina Chcmctskaya, Adelheid Walsh
PRINTING Warners Midlands pic
DISTRIBUTION Susan Saunders eMail: [email protected] Telephone: 0207 429 4073
ISSN 09£&-43S1 Having trouble finding Skin Deep magazine in your nouKagenl?
;:,l.jj'5i contact our distribution company lor yuw nearest outlet 0207 429 4CH73 or visit;
■Ml letter; sent to Stun Peep wilt be treated35 ijnconditionjiry asdijned far publication and tapyflyhl (nJfpnt« and as such ai e subject to edit end comment editonaily. please enmre th.n »II photm and rJid?s have credits attached Please send copies rroionglnals as wt can no longer return □ fi y unjclidted photograph! No r^spomi bility can be assumed tor unsolicited matenals. The views expressed m this magazine ty the con Lriburors are not necessarily those of Ihe publishers. White every effofl Is mnde in compllitHf skin Deep. the publishers cannnt be held responsible ioranv tifKfs therefrom. Reproduction of arty matter contained in Skin peep Is prohibited without prior permission. Adverts and adversers a pecan ng In SKIN PEEP or SKIN SHOTS INTERNATIONAL Magazines cany no implied recommendation from the magazines er From the puhfishers
Silting in the doctor's surgery the other day waiting for ray rum to go see the quack, I was idly thumbing through the usual castoff magazines and supplements when I came across a new cai advert depicting an obvious tattooist (a bloke in a dirty vest with some shakily drawn on tattoos). He was putting the finishing touches to a tattoo across a chap's back with the word 'Besplect'.
The Lag line was "Time for a swift exit?"
To start with I wasn't too sure what to think. Was this supposed to be funny? (Not really}, or did it once again say more about the ad man's perception of a typical tattooist? Sadly the latter, I guess. Why oh why do all those in the advertising and media game think that both tattooists and therefore tattooed individuals are not only a bit thick (i.e: the obvious'typo' misLake depicted in the advert! but also unable to do or expeoL a professional job?
The more I thought about it, the more it made my blood boil with the apparent flippancy of the ad company to say that all those that are in the tattooing industry are that flaky; that not only would they be remiss enough to tattoo a design wrongly in the Hist place, but that they are also so lacking in morals that they would do the tattoo, take the money and run?
Let's put the boot on the other foot, metaphorically, for a moment shall we? Say Lite advert depicLed a surgeon with a person on the operating table; green sterile cloths covering most of the body except for a square patch of skin where the operation has taken place instruments and bloody swabs littered about the place You look closer and you can see the obvious shape of a small kidney dish left under the poor person's skin, where the hapless surgeon had accidentally sewn the article into the patient.
Would the company still run the same tag line or indeed entertain this notion at all? Let's face it, many of us fiave heard of the odd case where people have spent months, even years walking around with various surgical implements inside them; it does happen - mercifully on very few occasions - and likewise tire odd tattooist can make a mistake so neither side is blameless.
So would my new version of the advert go to print? 1 think not.
Why do we have to constantly justify our actions and choices to the uneducated?
I presume it's because those in the medical profession are seen as good, clean, upstanding members of the community and tattooists aren't. Has the tattoo industry ever produced a Crippen or a Sliipman? (Okay, maybe it has, but they haven't been caught so far) Yet more proof tattooists aren't stupid!
I'm not trying to have a go at the medical profession as they do an incredible job of looking after the sick and needy.
It's just if these ad people gave tattooists the respect they deserve maybe the stigma of tattooists and tattoos might improve in the eyes of the uneducated. We in the industry have the greatest of respect for the guys and girls that pick up a machine and permanently mark others with their stunning artwork.
! get tired of seeing tattooing picked on. It's like seeing a loved one coming under attack by bullies & ne'er-do-wells powered by ignorance. The biggest ignorance is the damage they do to an age-old profession and the disrespect they show to people who decide to get inked.
Maybe I'm am getting too worked up by this off the cuff advert, and should dismiss it and just take it as the usual 'oh let's make a mockery of out of tattooing as it is obviously a shady business' but in this day and age of supposedly enlightened times, can we not open a maga2^ne or newspaper and see something that actually celebrates this wonderful, artistic and passionate industry that we all love?
Was this article helpful?